En paradox är en diskrepans/oöverenstämmelse mellan vad en teori utsäger och vad sunda förnuftet förväntar.

Se vad jag hittade när jag importerade den gamla MakroHård bloggen;

Stiftelsen är att den första gången publicerades på arabiska så kallades den Al-Qaida.

“Soon after the Sept. 11 attacks, some began speculating that al-Qaida, [...] was inspired by Asimov. Why? Foundation, when it was published in Arabic in 1952, was translated as Al-Qaida. The evidence seems thin, but if it”s true”

Hmmm det är något för George W Bush, kanske….

Länk: Filmen I, Robot och Isaac Asimov

Det ser ut som filmen Star Wars: The Clone Wars får riktigt dåliga recensioner. Lucasart har också försökt stoppa publiceringen av de dåliga recensionerna.

Star Wars: Clone Wars embargo? What embargo?

Vad hade de väntat sig när dom inför karaktärer som Baby Jabba Hutt och Jabba the Hutt”s Gay Uncle…..

Det ryktas om att George Lucas skall nu göra avsnitt 7, 8 och 9 i Star Wars sagan. Allt enligt Theforce.net och Irland Online. Diskusionen går vilt till på Slashdot.org.

Hehehe Predator 2 går just nu på tv 4.

En intressant artikel i slate skriven av Chris Suellentrop handlar om den kommanden filmen I, Robot har missuppfattat Isaac Asimov.

“Asimov”s novel I, Robot—which “suggested” the new movie of the same name—is basically an evangelical work, an argument against man”s superstitious fear of machines. By the end of the book, machines run the economy and most of the government. Their superior intelligence and cool rationality eliminate imperfections such as famine and unemployment. Asimov mocks unions for having shortsightedly “opposed robot competition for human jobs,” and he derides religious objections to new technology as the work of “Fundamentalist radicals.” Almost without exception, anytime robots in the book appear to be doing wrong or seeking to harm their human masters, it turns out that the suspicious humans are misguided; the robots, as programmed, are acting in man”s best interest.

Asimov”s faith in the rule of robots was genuine and based on his faith in the rule of reason. He viewed his now-canonical Rules of Robotics [- - -] as a roadmap for human ethics. Just as Asimov”s machines are better than people at calculating mathematics, they”re superior at coming to moral judgments as well. Susan Calvin, the book”s protagonist,calls robots a “cleaner better breed” than humans because they”re “essentially decent.” Superior logic produces superior ethics.”

Chris beskrivning av hur filmens manusförfattare har tolkat boken;

The movie takes the exact opposite approach and thereby betrays Asimov”s vision. It elevates feeling and emotion over reason as a tool to determine the right moral decisions. Will Smith”s character,Del Spooner, sneers at robots as “slaves to logic.” When another character pleads, “Whatever you feel, just think,” the audience is meant to take his preference for reason over sentiment as a sign of his villainy. And when the main antagonist outlines the Dastardly Plan unveiled during the film”s climax, the villain defends the treachery by asserting, “My logic is undeniable.”

Arrghh… Asimov måste vända sig i sin grav.

En annan intressant sak som jag inte viste boken Stiftelsen är att den första gången publicerades på arabiska så kallades den Al-Qaida.

“Soon after the Sept. 11 attacks, some began speculating that al-Qaida, [...] was inspired by Asimov. Why? Foundation, when it was published in Arabic in 1952, was translated as Al-Qaida. The evidence seems thin, but if it”s true”

Hmmm det är något för George W Bush, kanske….